Posted by SweeT_chiNmuZx_ (Ranked on Team Spades (Zone) Ladder) on March 08, 2005 at 19:38:18:
Doubt i will get my 20 games in so I vote : No for 35 roster size (unless given good reason to change my mind) because i think most of us want to stick it out for as long as we are capable of playing spades. That takes time. This is basically a new league with old faces. I make this point b/c what was room 4 from the very beginning?? Answer is "sit n play" format (like we say today). And like any ladder , things have to start from scratch. I see this ladder as "progressing" which is a common word u wud use for a new ladder. So i say stick it out and NO FOR 35 MAN ROSTER (unless given good reason to prove my case wrong)
Just my blabbing here , yes, but i see this as a team project that can be accomplished with everyones support so my feelings r we need to stick it out for the duration.
If roster size does exceed to 35, do we have to merge teams??? I dont think so. Adding people from rated, friends you know from yahoo, or other ladders or friends from social is a solution to those who dont agree with the idea of an increased roster size b/c it doesnt take away from other team's nor does it reduce teams cuz u are "Recruitinggggg". And It Does NOT Reduce Games In This Room Which Is For The Most-Part The Only Reason Are In This Room Besides Having Fun With Old Friends.......